FINALLY – the Truth about Plastics & the Environment

By Dr. Chris DeArmitt FRSC

World-class plastic materials scientist

Ocean Plastic:

Patches or Gyres

Ocean plastic is drawing huge amounts of international attention. We have all been told about the huge floating islands of plastics the size of countries. Here is one example –

“…the Great Pacific Garbage Patch in the North Pacific Ocean is less like a patch and more like a massive swirling vortex more than three times the size of Spain and more than twice the size of Turkey or Texas.”

This conjures up a powerful image and rallies the public to action. I was therefore surprised to read what the National Ocean Service (NOAA) had to say.

“A lot of people hear the word patch and they immediately think of almost like a blanket of trash that can easily be scooped up, but actually these areas are always moving and changing with the currents, and it’s mostly these tiny plastics that you can’t immediately see with the naked eye.”
– Dianna Parker

So, apparently, there are no floating islands, instead there are areas that contain tiny pieces of plastic. Dianna Parker was then asked about the “plastic soup” and this is what she had to say:
“These are tiny plastics that you might not even see if you sailed through the middle of the garbage patch, they’re so small and mixed throughout the water column.”
That was news to me. She is saying that there is so little plastic in the so-called patches that you can’t even tell they are there. So I went looking for peer-reviewed scientific studies to find out just how much plastic there really is. I found a study giving an overview of several studies covering all the patches. It turns out that scientists have been studying these areas for decades and millions of measurements have been made. What do the scientists report about the concentration of plastic fragments?
The scientists show that the average amount of plastic in the oceans overall is around 10g per square kilometer. That’s about 1 ounce of plastic per square mile of ocean. I was surprised at how little that was.
Clearly, we don’t want litter of any kind in our oceans but the amount seemed remarkably low compared to what I expected from media coverage. The data showed that there is far more plastic in the patches, but how much more? Looking at all the studies, the worst areas contain 500g of plastic per square kilometer of ocean on average and at most around 1000g per square kilometer. That’s about 2-4lb per square mile of ocean. It’s hard to imagine a square kilometer, so let’s pick an area we can relate to. An Olympic swimming pool measures 50m x 25m which is 0.00125 square kilometers in surface area. That means that if we were to drop a 5g plastic die from a board game into an Olympic pool, that would be more plastic than we find in the same amount of ocean.
Let me restate that, the worst areas of ocean “patches” contain less plastic than 5g per Olympic pool of water.
The ocean patches are often referred to as a plastic soup. If it is a soup, then it’s the weakest soup I’ve ever heard of. If you were to pour a bathtub of this “soup” it would not contain one single piece of plastic. That’s not a soup, that’s just water! On average they found just 1 piece of plastic per 130 bathtubs of water and at most 1 small plastic fragment per 3 bathtubs of water.
Let us hear what the scientists had to say when reviewing the actual data from their measurements:
“The discovery of large-scale accumulations of marine debris has attracted worldwide attention in the media, which often refer to these areas as “great garbage patches”. However, these marine plastic accumulations are inaccurately illustrated in some media reports.”
Note that these scientists are not alone. Other studies show the same amount of plastic in the gyres. We are also told that the ocean plastic is accumulating at an every increasing pace. Is that true? Scientists have been tracking the trends for several decades. This is what they have to say:
“A study of plastic microdebris in waters from the British Isles to Iceland (5) revealed a statistically significant increase in plastic abundance from the 1960s and 1970s to the 1980s and 1990s. However, similar to this study, no significant increase was observed between the later decades despite a large increase in plastic production and disposal.”
So, contrary to what we have been told, there is no upward trend. The evidence exposes yet another lie.
I would agree that we should take care of our oceans but we should start with facts so that we can make wise decisions. It seems to me that certain groups, claiming to be environmentalists, are more interested into scaring us into opening our wallets than they are in protecting the environment.
If we are to really protect the planet for future generations we need to check the science and focus on the topics that make most difference. I spent some time checking to see what pollution there is in our oceans and was dismayed to find that millions of tons of munitions were dumped there including chemical weapons and nerve gas. Why is no-one talking about that? Perhaps the fake environmentalists don’t feel there’s money to be made from it.
If you want to be a force for good then please spend time to check the evidence before you act because that is the only path to progress. Recently, I read about 500 scientific articles about plastic waste, litter, ocean gyres, microplastics and more, so that we can start making wise decisions. That resulted in The Plastics Paradox: Facts for a Brighter Future.

The Plastics Paradox is Out Now!

Got a question? Let me know…